Short summary sheet

Startup Estonia · Committee pack · Confidential for evaluation

Metrico

Full business plan — construction operations SaaS

Company direction: Estonian / EU SaaS base
Founder: Mehrzad Saeedi
Document: Full plan (English) · August 2026
Companion: Short summary sheet · Full founder CV · Committee one-pager & evidence sheets
Live product: https://mehrzad1420.github.io/metrico_by_cursor/index.html
Contact: hello@metrico.app · mehrzad.saeedi@gmail.com
Honesty note This plan does not invent paying customers, ARR charts, logos, headcount, or M&A stories. Traction is early and limited; financial figures are labeled assumptions or list prices. Geographic weights describe Year-1 effort focus, not promised revenue by country.

Contents

  1. Executive summary
  2. Problem
  3. Solution & product
  4. Market & ICP
  5. Competition & differentiation
  6. Business model & unit economics
  7. Go-to-market
  8. Traction & validation
  9. Estonia / EU presence plan
  10. Team & hiring
  11. Financial outlook (assumptions)
  12. Risks & mitigations
  13. Milestones & ask
  14. Appendix — links & materials

1. Executive summary

Metrico is a live, bilingual (English / Persian) SaaS progressive web application for mid-size construction developers and contractors. It unifies the pre-sale → build → handover operating loop: visual unit inventories, installment schedules, project finance, and owner-safe progress updates — including offline use on weak-signal sites.

The product is not a slide deck. It is in production use for demos, onboarding, and one live construction project run by the founder. Early validation is intentionally framed as early: the founder is an active user with roughly ten years across investor, supervising engineer, and site superintendent roles; a small circle of four reviewers (plus spouse co-builder) provides practical feedback; there is no invented customer count.

Commercial model: annual prepaid SaaS plans — Starter free, Plus €50/year, Pro €100/year, Ark €150/year. Primary revenue is paid upgrades. European card billing is under development; an Iran checkout path exists. Unit economics are early-model assumptions, not audited KPIs.

Year-1 geographic effort weights (planning assumptions, not revenue share): Iran ≈ 30% (familiar operating market for feedback), Estonia ≈ 50% (company base, hiring, EU beachhead learning), other markets ≈ 20% (selective later European outreach). Adoption assumption: roughly 30–60 early users in twelve months, with discounts and referral mechanics — not an ARR promise.

Estonia path: initiate e-Residency in parallel with committee preparation; register the Estonian company after committee approval; relocate with family after the founder’s current home-country construction project finishes; hire one developer preferably in Estonia / EU; start from home office. Year-1 living + GTM budget assumption: €40,000. Language roadmap: English first, then German for DACH. No M&A narrative. Ask: Startup Committee recognition to build Metrico as a serious Estonian / EU software company with a clear path to company registration, EU billing, and specialized hiring.

One-line positioning The all-in-one site operations tool for mid-size construction — a Swiss-army knife for when units, money, and owners collide — credible field utility, not a lifestyle brand or local agency service.

2. Problem

Mid-size residential and commercial developers still run the commercial heart of a project — which units are sold, what buyers owe, what investors need to see, and what owners may safely see — across spreadsheets, chat threads, notebooks, and paper. That stack breaks as soon as several projects run in parallel, or when a site team needs answers on a phone with poor connectivity.

2.1 Daily failure modes

2.2 Who feels this most

Builders and developers selling units off-plan or in stages; contractors and executors coordinating delivery with commercial status; technical offices and site supervisors who are asked for both progress and commercial answers. The founder lived these gaps as investor, supervising engineer, and superintendent — which is why Metrico’s product direction starts from field workflows rather than from a generic project board template.

2.3 Why “another CRM” or “another PM tool” does not close the gap

Contact-centric CRM platforms leave the unit map and payment plan in separate systems. Work hubs (task boards) can track activity but do not ship construction-native objects — floors, units, sale status, down payments, installment rows, check views — out of the box. Local accounting packages are strong at books after the fact, weaker at live site + owner communication. Spreadsheet portfolios scale poorly across phones, permissions, and offline work. The market therefore still has room for a focused, repeatable SaaS for the money-and-units loop of mid-size construction.

3. Solution & product

Metrico is a construction command center delivered as an installable progressive web app. Teams use it on phone, tablet, and desktop; they can install it to the home screen and work offline on site, syncing when connectivity returns. The interface ships bilingual English and Persian from day one.

3.1 Core product loop

3.2 Innovation thesis

Metrico’s innovation is not another generic project board. It is a repeatable operating system for the construction pre-sale → build → handover loop: visual unit grids, installment math, site finance, and owner updates in one bilingual offline-capable product. Generic CRMs track contacts; heavyweight construction suites optimize job-site logistics. Mid-size developers still run units, buyers, and receivables in spreadsheets and chat. Metrico closes that gap with software leverage — the same SaaS sold on annual plans — so growth does not require rebuilding a custom agency stack for every project or country.

3.3 Product stage & plan ladder

Metrico is a live SaaS / PWA in production use for demos and onboarding — not a concept deck. Four annual plans gate depth and portfolio size:

Demo vs traction Evaluators can use a labeled demo account (demo@metrico.app) for a read-only Ark-level walkthrough — sample data, not paying customers. Password is provided by founders on request (not published in the public repository). Anyone can also start on Starter free.

3.4 What Metrico is not

4. Market & ICP

4.1 Ideal customer profile (Year 1)

Early buyers and design partners are construction operators who feel the unit–finance–progress gap daily:

Primary go-to-market thesis: grow Metrico as a leading app in its domain through product strength and field referrals — the best marketer is a power-user site supervisor who can introduce peers more credibly than cold advertising.

4.2 Year-1 geographic effort weights

The following percentages describe where the founders expect to spend time and attention in Year 1. They are not a claimed revenue split by country.

FocusEffort weightRationale
Iran ≈ 30% Familiar operating market: language, relationships, field workflows. Useful for product feedback and early operators.
Estonia ≈ 50% Primary company base and technical hiring environment; early pilots; denser product feedback; beachhead for learning EU sales — not “50% of revenue from Estonian contractors.”
Other markets ≈ 20% Selective later European outreach after the Estonia anchor works — not a spray of fake regional claims.

4.3 Adoption goal (assumption)

Operational target for the first twelve months: roughly 30–60 early users. Some will enter with strong discounts; referral discounts will reward introducing colleagues. Frame as early adoption and GTM mechanic — not an ARR promise or paying-conversion guarantee. Conversion rates will be measured once paid cohorts exist; they are not invented here.

4.4 Path narrative (markets)

Learn in a pilot / familiar market → expand regionally where the same SaaS core fits → operate from an Estonian / EU company base → sell a repeatable product into European and international construction teams. Iran can be an early feedback market because the unit + installment pain is real there; it is not positioned as the final geography of the company.

5. Competition & differentiation

The landscape note below describes Metrico’s advantages only — not a critique of other products. Other tools are useful in their domains. Metrico is built for mid-size developers who live in unit sales, installments, and owner updates every day.

5.1 International reference points

5.2 Regional / local reference points

5.3 Differentiation summary

6. Business model & unit economics

Labeled assumptions — not live KPIs Figures below describe the pricing ladder and a simple early-stage model. They are not reported CAC, LTV, or MRR from a large paying base. Demo data is labeled demo and is not paying traction.

6.1 Revenue model

6.2 Pricing ladder (list prices)

PlanAnnual listWhat it unlocks (summary)
StarterFree1 project · core unit/expense tools · evaluation entry
Plus€50Up to 3 projects · PDFs · owner portal · maps · drawings gallery
Pro€100Up to 10 projects · accounting · inventory · contracts · KML
Ark€150High project ceiling · energy · takeoff; demo runs at Ark

European list prices are annual euro amounts; Persian checkout shows local Toman equivalents where configured.

6.3 Checkout paths

6.4 Unit economics (early model)

7. Go-to-market

7.1 Next 90 days

Near-term field work the founders will actually do:

  1. Attend one construction / industry exhibition.
  2. Meet several construction companies in person; visit sites and workshops.
  3. Individual talks with site supervisors to introduce the product and seed a first referral network.
  4. Advance committee / e-Residency preparation in parallel — company registration after approval (see Section 9).

Channels: person-to-person introductions, visits to notable construction firms, relevant construction and IT exhibitions, and social / domain platforms. The team will travel for intros when needed. No invented logos or fake stats.

7.2 Year 1

Ordered for company building (business-first):

  1. Establish the Estonian company after committee approval; complete e-Residency / company setup needed to operate.
  2. Local validation: run Metrico in Estonia’s digital environment; gather early-user feedback.
  3. Hire one developer preferably in Estonia / EU.
  4. Investor and customer intro platforms plus a realistic exhibition calendar.
  5. Grow a site-supervisor referral network and run demos; pursue the ~30–60 early-user adoption band with discount / referral mechanics.
  6. Family relocation and suitable housing after (or alongside completion of) the founder’s current construction project — enabling the Estonian base, not the headline goal of this plan.

7.3 Year 2–3 (directional)

Direction only — not invented metrics. After Year-1 beachhead learning:

7.4 What we will not do

8. Traction & validation

Early-stage validation — not scaled commercial traction We do not invent company names, paying-customer counts, or growth charts. What follows is the real circle of use and feedback as of now.

8.1 Founder as active user

Metrico is built by someone who lives the same workflows the product serves. For about ten years the founder has worked across residential and commercial projects as:

Additionally, roughly four years of site superintendent / workshop supervision as construction project manager and as builder/investor deepen that domain seat (founder statement; complementary to the older printed CV timeline).

8.2 Gaps before Metrico

8.3 What the product already covers

On the founder’s own work, Metrico addresses a major share of those gaps — from financial and accounting issues through progress supervision and owner communication. The founder’s estimate: about 70% of the previous problems and blind spots are now handled in the product.

8.4 Early operators & feedback circle

Beyond the founder and his spouse — who design and build the product together — four people are currently reviewing and using Metrico. They help find issues and give practical feedback. Roles in that circle include project supervisors, architect / designer perspectives, and builder and investor perspectives. Frame honestly: early validation and design partners — not “X paying customers.”

8.5 Current live usage

One live construction project is currently being run with Metrico. That is the active operating proof today — useful and real, and still early.

9. Estonia / EU presence plan

9.1 Why Estonia

9.2 Planned sequence (honest)

  1. Initiate e-Residency now — can run in parallel with committee preparation; not yet started as of this document.
  2. Register the Estonian company after committee approval — preferred timing; company registration is not a precondition for committee review.
  3. Complete e-Residency and company setup before physical relocation.
  4. Relocate with family after the current construction project in the home country finishes — no invented calendar dates.

9.3 Twelve-month presence model

9.4 First 90 days (Estonia-related)

9.5 Language roadmap

Product and GTM languages: English first. Next: German for DACH (Germany, Austria, Switzerland). We do not claim German as a common language of the Netherlands or invent other locale claims.

9.6 Year-1 budget assumption

Planned year-1 living + go-to-market budget assumption: €40,000 — covering residence for the founder, spouse, and two children, plus marketing / exhibitions and related early GTM costs. Assumption for planning — not a grant claim or audited spend.

9.7 What this is not

10. Team & hiring

10.1 Current team (intentionally lean)

10.2 Next hire

One developer, preferably in Estonia / EU — to increase engineering bandwidth for product quality, EU localization readiness, and billing / compliance features. Home office first; no invented large engineering org chart.

10.3 Why this founding profile fits the problem

Product direction comes from three angles inside construction: urban / GIS public-sector work, builder / owner–investor economics, and day-to-day site supervision. That combination reduces the risk of building a generic tool that misses installment, unit-map, and owner-privacy realities. Full CV is provided as a companion PDF for committee review.

11. Financial outlook (assumptions)

Conservative scenarios — clearly labeled The tables below are planning scenarios for committee discussion. They are not audited forecasts, contracted pipeline, or promises. Conversion and retention rates are illustrative assumptions until measured. No hockey-stick without stating the levers.

11.1 Cost base (Year 1)

ItemAssumptionNotes
Living + early GTM €40,000 Founder planning assumption for residence (founder, spouse, two children) + exhibitions / marketing
Hosting / tooling Low four digits / year (order-of-magnitude) Lean SaaS stack; not itemized as a grant ask
First developer hire To be sized after company setup Priority hire in Estonia / EU; salary not fabricated as a precise EU market guarantee here
Office €0 initially Home / residence first

11.2 Revenue scenarios (illustrative)

Using list prices and the early-user band of ~30–60. Scenarios vary paying conversion among early users — unknown until measured. Figures are annual subscription revenue at list (before discounts).

Scenario Early users Assumed paying mix Illustrative annual revenue
Conservative 30 10 paying on Plus (€50) ≈ €500
Base 45 15 Plus + 5 Pro ≈ €1,250
Optimistic (still early) 60 20 Plus + 10 Pro + 5 Ark ≈ €2,750

These Year-1 revenue illustrations are deliberately modest. They show that Metrico is not pretending to be a multi-million ARR story on day one. The business case for committee recognition is the live product, domain founder fit, EU company path, and software leverage — not fantasy Year-1 revenue. Discounts and referrals will reduce effective ARPU further in the earliest cohorts.

11.3 Year 2–3 directional outlook

If beachhead learning works — measured conversion, EU billing live, one developer hired, supervisor referral network active — Year 2–3 can expand paid accounts through EU platforms, partners, and direct outreach while keeping the same SaaS core. We do not invent precise Year-3 ARR. Upside comes from software margin and retention on annual prepaid plans; downside is slow conversion or delayed EU billing (see risks). Secondary revenue (seats, add-ons) only if demand proves it.

11.4 Capital stance

Year-1 operations are planned lean (€40k living + GTM assumption). Capital / asset transfer timing to Estonia is a recognized risk (Section 12). This plan does not claim grant awards, completed fundraising rounds, or M&A exits.

12. Risks & mitigations

Managed risks — honest, not fear-mongering. Mitigations are operational, not guarantees.

12.1 Geopolitical spillover (Russia–Europe)

Risk: regional instability affecting travel, sentiment, or capital flows. Mitigation: EU company base, English-first product, diversified beachhead learning — not single-country dependency for all learning.

12.2 Middle East recession pressure

Risk: weaker demand in familiar early markets. Mitigation: Year-1 effort already weights Estonia / EU beachhead; Iran remains a feedback market, not the end destination.

12.3 Capital / asset transfer to Estonia

Risk: timing and compliance friction moving capital. Mitigation: lean year-1 budget assumption (€40k); start home-office; no invented grants.

12.4 Product intro timing vs finding prospects

Risk: product readiness and prospect pipeline misaligned. Mitigation: founder-as-user + supervisor referral network; exhibition and site visits in the 90-day plan.

12.5 Competing where markets / marketing are less known

Risk: rivals with deeper local marketing. Mitigation: domain wedge (units + installments + owner portal), honest competitor sheet, beachhead learning before spray spend.

12.6 EU payments / billing readiness

Risk: European card checkout still under development. Mitigation: labeled paths (email / founder codes); prioritize EU billing after company setup.

12.7 Early-team bandwidth

Risk: two-person core capacity. Mitigation: one EU developer hire as a top Year-1 priority; scope GTM to exhibitions, referrals, and demos — not heavy paid media.

12.8 Language / localization & CAC uncertainty

Risk: beyond EN/FA; CAC not yet measured. Mitigation: EN first, then German/DACH on roadmap; treat CAC/LTV as early model — no fake conversion rates.

13. Milestones & ask

13.1 Near-term milestones

  1. Complete Startup Estonia committee pack (this full plan, short summary, CV, evidence sheets, live demo).
  2. Initiate e-Residency application in parallel.
  3. Committee review / recognition.
  4. Register Estonian company after approval; progress EU-ready billing.
  5. Execute 90-day field GTM (exhibition, firm meetings, site visits, supervisor network).
  6. Hire one developer (Estonia / EU preference).
  7. Relocate with family after current construction project completes; validate product locally in Estonia.
  8. Measure early conversion among the ~30–60 early-user band; iterate pricing discounts and referrals from data.

13.2 Ask — what committee recognition enables

13.3 Closing statement

Metrico is a serious early-stage software company with a live product, a domain founder, and an honest Estonia path. We ask for committee review on that basis — not on invented traction.

14. Appendix — links & materials

14.1 Live product & demo

14.2 Committee sheets (HTML sources in repo · EN PDFs under guide/committee-pdfs/)

14.3 Contact